Venus and the Invisible Woman: What Gen X Women Carried in Their Bodies

A Reflection on Beauty, Pressure,

and the Bodies We Were Told to Shrink

by Katya Faris, MA, MA

Book Your Reading

Uma’s Upayas Astrological Aromatherapy on Amazon & FREE on Kindle

FREE SIDEREAL CHART CALCULATOR

There is a horrifying conversation happening in universities right now about Generation X women. In gender studies classrooms, in media critique seminars, in conversations about body politics and generational attitudes, Gen X women are being analyzed—and often, judged.

The narrative goes something like this: Gen X women were raised on diet culture. They internalized thinness as a moral imperative. They passed that shame down to their daughters. They are the generation that couldn’t let go of the scale, the mirror, the constant self-surveillance. They are, in some framings, the “worst” about body image.

It’s a tidy story. It fits on a slide. But it misses something essential.

What younger generations sometimes don’t understand is that the Gen X woman’s relationship with her body was not born in a vacuum. It was a reaction to a pressure so relentless, so all-encompassing, that it became invisible. And that pressure had a name: Venus.

Not Venus as a goddess to be worshipped. Venus as a standard to be enforced. Venus as a weapon.

And Gen X women carried that Venus in every sign of the zodiac. Aries. Taurus. Gemini. Cancer. Leo. Virgo. Libra. Scorpio. Sagittarius. Capricorn. Aquarius. Pisces. No placement was exempt from the culture’s demand to shrink. But each placement experienced the pressure differently—and each has its own story of how that pressure was internalized, survived, and ultimately transformed.

Venus in Every Sign: One Pressure, Many Wounds

In astrology, Venus rules beauty, pleasure, the body, and how we are seen by others. In a healthy chart, Venus is generous. She delights in the body. She adorns it, feeds it, celebrates it. But Venus has a shadow. When she is distorted by culture, by media, by fear, she becomes a judge. And for Gen X women coming of age in the 1980s and 1990s, that judge was merciless—regardless of where Venus sat in the birth chart.

The pressure did not discriminate by placement. It did not care whether your Venus was in Leo, craving adoration, or in Pisces, dissolving into fantasy, or in Capricorn, measuring worth by achievement. The culture had one message for every Venus: Your body is wrong, and it is your fault, and you must fix it.

But the way that message landed depended on the sign.

Venus in Aries may have fought back—angry, defiant, refusing to conform—but still felt the sting of being told she was too much, too big, too loud, too visible.

Venus in Taurus—her own sign, her place of comfort—may have felt the deepest betrayal. Here was a Venus who wanted to luxuriate in the body, to savor pleasure, to rest in her own skin. And the culture told her that her skin was wrong.

Venus in Gemini may have intellectualized the pain, reading every diet book, collecting every weight-loss theory, turning her body into a research project rather than a home.

Venus in Cancer may have comforted herself with food, then punished herself for needing comfort, caught in a cycle of nurture and shame that mirrored the maternal wound.

Venus in Leo may have hidden her hunger for admiration behind self-deprecation, afraid to be seen wanting attention when her body was deemed unworthy of it.

Venus in Virgo—debilitated, self-critical, always noticing the flaw—may have turned the culture’s cruelty inward, believing that if she could just be perfect enough, small enough, disciplined enough, she would finally earn the right to exist without apology.

Venus in Libra—her other home, the sign of balance and beauty—may have felt the pressure most acutely. Here was a Venus who was supposed to embody grace and aesthetics, and the culture told her she was failing at the very thing she was born to be.

Venus in Scorpio may have kept her pain private, burning with a quiet intensity, channeling her shame into secrecy and control.

Venus in Sagittarius may have run from the mirror, seeking freedom in movement, adventure, and escape—only to find that the body follows wherever you go.

Venus in Capricorn may have translated the pressure into achievement, believing that if she could just succeed enough, be accomplished enough, her body would finally be accepted as a vessel for her worth rather than a liability.

Venus in Aquarius may have detached from the body entirely, retreating into the mind, the ideals, the future—pretending the flesh didn’t hurt when the world told her it was wrong.

Venus in Pisces may have dissolved into the fantasy, dreaming of a body that wasn’t hers, escaping into art and spirit while the physical self carried the silent burden of inadequacy.

Every Gen X woman carried some version of this. The pressure was universal. But the wound was personal, shaped by the sign where Venus sat in her chart.

The Maternity Section: A Generation’s Quiet Humiliation

Let’s talk about clothes.

Because Venus rules adornment, and clothing is how we participate in Venus’s domain. For a young Gen X woman who was above a certain size, shopping was not a pleasure. It was a ritual of shame—a physical confirmation of what the culture and, in some cases, her own Venus placement had been telling her: You don’t fit. You don’t belong. You are a problem to be solved.

There were no plus-size sections in most stores. No extended sizes in trendy boutiques. No body-positive influencers showing you how to dress your shape with pride. If you were a size 14 or 16 or 18 and you wanted something to wear to a party, a job interview, a first date, you had two options:

The frumpy, shapeless “big and tall” section of a department store—if one existed—or the maternity section.

Yes. The maternity section.

Young women, teenagers, women in their twenties and thirties who had never been pregnant were buying maternity clothes because that was the only place that carried anything large enough to fit their bodies. Let that sink in. The fashion industry’s message to a generation of women was: If you are not thin, you may as well be pregnant. Your body is not a body. It’s a condition to be managed.

And the clothes in those sections? Tent dresses. Elastic waistbands. Floral prints designed to hide, not to flatter. Nothing that said sexy or professional or alive. Just fabric to cover the shame.

For a Venus in Leo, this was an erasure of her need to be seen. For a Venus in Taurus, it was a betrayal of her birthright to comfort and beauty. For a Venus in Scorpio, it was an indignity she would never speak of but never forget.

The White Supremacist Standard: When Venus Was Blonde

There is another layer to this conversation that is often left out of the academic analysis, and it is essential: race.

The body standard that Gen X women grew up under was not just thin. It was white. Specifically, it was an exaggerated, idealized version of white womanhood—super thin, pretty, and above all, blonde. This was the image that dominated magazines, movies, music videos, and advertising. It was the standard against which all women were measured, and it was not accidental.

It was constructed.

To understand the pressure Gen X women faced, you have to understand the history. The Ku Klux Klan did not just terrorize Black Americans. It also enforced a specific vision of white womanhood—pure, delicate, protected, and above reproach. This vision became the template for American femininity. The ideal woman was not just white. She was the right kind of white: blonde, thin, modest, and visually aligned with a white supremacist fantasy of purity and innocence.

This standard was not confined to the Klan. It seeped into the culture. Hollywood rewarded it. Beauty pageants codified it. Fashion magazines enforced it. The message was clear: This is what a woman should look like. Everything else is a deviation.

By the 1980s and 1990s, when Gen X women were coming of age, this standard had been absorbed so thoroughly into American culture that it no longer needed to be named. It was simply the water we swam in. The supermodels of the era—tall, thin, overwhelmingly white, often blonde—were not just fashion icons. They were the latest iteration of a beauty hierarchy that had been built on white supremacy from the beginning.

For women who did not fit that standard—Black women, Latina women, Asian women, Indigenous women, Jewish women, Italian women, anyone whose body or features did not align with the Nordic ideal—the message was not just “you are fat” or “you are not pretty.” The message was: You do not exist. You are not the standard. You are invisible.

For white women who did not fit—brunettes, curvy women, women with larger noses or darker features—the message was only slightly softer: You are a flawed version of the ideal. You can fix yourself. You can dye your hair. You can lose the weight. You can try, always try, to become the standard.

And for the Gen X woman living in places like Indiana, the pressure was particularly acute. The Midwest was not just culturally white. It was actively, historically, violently invested in whiteness. The Klan had a powerful presence in Indiana in the 1920s, and its influence on local culture—including standards of beauty and morality—lingered for generations. The ideal woman in Indiana was not just thin. She was blonde, Nordic, and visibly white.

If you were not that, you were excused from the competition. And being excused was its own kind of wound. Because what it really meant was: You were never a contender. You were never the standard. You were never seen.

The Appropriation Shift: When the Standard Became the Black Body—Distorted

And then something shifted.

By the late 1990s and into the 2000s, the culture began to change. The white supremacist standard did not disappear, but it was challenged. Hip-hop culture rose. Black beauty began to influence fashion, music, and media. Curves that had once been hidden or shamed began to be acknowledged.

But here is what happened, and it is crucial to name it: the culture did not simply accept the Black female body. It appropriated it. And it did so by exaggerating it into a cartoon.

The new standard became an extreme, almost mockable version of Black femininity. Big boobs. Big lips. Big butts. All implants. All surgically enhanced. All designed to imitate—and simultaneously mock—the Black female body that had been excluded from beauty standards for centuries.

The message was insidious. It said: We will now celebrate the features we once mocked—but only on white bodies, and only when they are exaggerated to the point of parody.

White women began getting lip fillers to mimic full lips. Breast implants to mimic curves. Butt implants and Brazilian butt lifts to mimic a body shape that Black women had been shamed for carrying naturally. The very features that had been used to justify the exclusion of Black women from the beauty ideal were now being sold back to white women as enhancements.

And Black women? They were still largely invisible in the mainstream fashion and beauty industries. Their natural bodies were still not the standard. Their features were only acceptable when replicated, surgically, on white bodies. This is not inclusion. This is theft. And it is a mockery.

For Gen X women who lived through both eras—the white supremacist standard of their youth and the appropriative shift of their midlife—the confusion was real. They had spent their young adulthood trying to shrink themselves into the blonde ideal. Now they were being told to inflate themselves into a new ideal that was itself a distortion of Blackness.

The common thread was that the standard was never about women’s actual bodies. It was about control. It was about keeping women in a state of perpetual inadequacy, always chasing an ideal that was designed to be unreachable, always comparing themselves to a template that was never built for them in the first place.

What This Means for the Conversation

When we talk about Gen X women and body image, we have to include race. We have to talk about the Klan’s beauty standard and how it shaped generations of American women. We have to talk about the appropriative shift that followed and how it mocked Black women while excluding them still.

Gen X women of color grew up under a double burden: the pressure to be thin, and the impossibility of ever being the white ideal. They were invisible in magazines, invisible in fashion, invisible in the culture’s vision of beauty. And when the culture finally began to acknowledge curves, it did so by putting them on white bodies and calling it progress.

This is not a footnote to the story of Gen X body image. It is the story. Venus, in her shadow, has always been racialized. And the work of reclaiming the body is also the work of reclaiming race, visibility, and the right to exist outside the templates that were never built for us.

The Internet Did Not Make It Worse—It Made It Visible

There is a common assumption today that the internet and social media have made body image harder for young women. And it’s true that social media has created new pressures—curated perfection, algorithmic comparison, filters that erase every pore and flaw. But the idea that it is worse now misses something essential.

What younger generations sometimes don’t understand is that the pre-internet era was not easier. It was quieter. And quiet does not mean safe. Quiet means isolation.

Before the internet, a young woman who hated her body had nowhere to go with that pain. She couldn’t find a community of women who understood. She couldn’t search for body-positive content. She couldn’t discover that the impossible standard was impossible for everyone else too. She was alone with her shame, in her bedroom, with only a magazine to tell her she was failing.

The internet did not invent body shame. It exposed it. It gave women a place to name what had always been true, to share their stories, to find each other. The body positivity movement, the fat acceptance movement, the language of self-love and body neutrality—all of this was born online, because for the first time in history, women could speak to each other across distance and discover they were not alone.

A Gen X woman in 1990 could not do that. She could not Google “how to dress a size 18.” She could not find a hashtag full of women who looked like her. She could not watch a video of a confident, fashionable plus-size woman trying on clothes and laughing with joy. She had only the silence of her own shame and the humiliation of the maternity section.

And she carried that silence in the unique way her Venus placement dictated. Some internalized it. Some raged against it. Some retreated from it. But none of them had the tools to name it publicly, to find each other, to build the movement that would eventually change the world.

So when younger generations say the internet has made body image worse, they are looking at the wrong culprit. The internet didn’t create the pressure. It illuminated it. And in illuminating it, it also created the first real possibility of healing.

Gen X women didn’t have that possibility. They carried the full weight of Venus’s judgment—in whatever sign she occupied—without a single counter-narrative to hold onto.

The Reaction Was Survival, Not Shallowness

And here is the part younger generations sometimes miss.

When Gen X women obsessed over thinness—when they dieted, when they counted calories, when they weighed themselves daily, when they passed that anxiety down to their daughters—it wasn’t because they were vain. It was because thinness was the only form of safety they were offered.

Thin meant employable. Thin meant marriageable. Thin meant worthy of being seen. Thin meant you had done the work, controlled the appetite, earned the right to exist in public without commentary.

The pressure was not subtle. It was economic, social, romantic, and existential. A fat Gen X woman was not just ignored. She was penalized. She was the punchline. She was the cautionary tale.

And regardless of her Venus placement, she had no exit. Venus in Aries could not fight her way out of a culture that penalized her body. Venus in Capricorn could not achieve her way out of a standard that was designed to be impossible. Venus in Pisces could not dream her way out of a physical reality that demanded she shrink.

So when Gen X women internalized the pressure to be thin, they were not choosing superficiality. They were choosing survival within a system that offered no other path.

Venus Then and Now: What Has Changed

Let’s look at this through the astrology.

Venus in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s was in a cultural place of extreme constriction. The ideal was narrow. The images were airbrushed. The bodies celebrated were not just thin—they were pre-pubescent, angular, almost androgynous. For a generation of women whose Venus wanted to be seen, to be adorned, to be loved, the only acceptable form was starvation.

Today, Venus has expanded. The culture has opened. We see curves celebrated on magazine covers. We see diverse body types in fashion campaigns. We see the language of self-love and body neutrality everywhere. It’s not perfect—far from it. But it’s a revolution compared to what came before.

And here’s the irony: the younger generation that enjoys this expansion often doesn’t realize that Gen X women fought for it without knowing they were fighting. They dieted, and failed, and dieted again, and in their failure, they proved that the impossible standard was impossible. They raised daughters and told them, quietly, I don’t want this for you. They broke the silence in their own broken way, and that breaking created the space for the next generation to speak.

The internet didn’t make it worse. It made it possible to heal. Gen X women just didn’t have that tool when they needed it most.

A Message to the Younger Generation

If you are a young woman sitting in a university classroom, learning about gender and media and the history of body image, and your professor tells you that Gen X women were the problem—pause.

Ask yourself: What was she reacting to?

What would it have been like to be a teenager in 1990, unable to find a single dress in your size that wasn’t in the maternity section? What would it have been like to be told, from every direction, that your body was a failure, a joke, a thing to be hidden? What would it have been like to have no movement, no community, no vocabulary to fight back—only the grinding, daily pressure to shrink?

And what would it have been like to face all of that without the internet—without a single place to find other women who understood, without a single image of a body like yours being celebrated, without a single voice saying you are not alone?

Gen X women did not invent diet culture. They survived it. And the ways they survived—the calorie counting, the self-criticism, the constant vigilance—were not character flaws. They were coping mechanisms forged in a fire that younger generations have never had to stand in alone.

You are the first generation in modern history to grow up seeing bodies like yours celebrated. That is not an accident. It is the harvest of seeds planted by women who were told they were too fat, too much, too big—and who kept walking anyway, in silence, without a single witness.

A Message to Gen X Women

And if you are a Gen X woman reading this—especially a larger Gen X woman who remembers the maternity section, the shame of shopping, the mirror that always seemed to be lying—this is for you.

Venus is not your enemy. She never was.

The culture that distorted Venus into a weapon—that used her to punish you for taking up space—is what failed you. Your Venus, in whatever sign she occupies, is not a flaw in your chart. She is a record of how you learned to survive the impossible. And in midlife, she can teach you something new: how to reclaim the body you were told to abandon.

You were not wrong for wanting to be beautiful. You were not shallow for wanting to be seen. You were not weak for internalizing the message that thinness was safety. You were human, in a time that offered no alternative, no witness, no way out.

And now, in midlife, Venus offers something different. Not a mirror that says smaller, but a Venus that says: You are still here. Your body carried you through the fire. It deserves adornment, pleasure, and respect—not punishment.

You don’t have to shop in the maternity section anymore. And even if you do, you don’t have to hide.

Venus, at her highest, is not a judge. She is an invitation. And she is inviting you, finally, to come home to the body you were always told to abandon.

This article is offered in the spirit of reflection and healing. If you are a Gen X woman who has carried the weight of body shame, or a younger woman beginning to understand the inheritance you’ve received, you are welcome here. The conversation about Venus, bodies, and generational pain is not about assigning blame. It’s about understanding the fire—so we can stop passing the torch of shame to the next generation. 💛

References

1. Bordo, Susan. Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. University of California Press, 1993.

2. Wolf, Naomi. The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women. William Morrow and Company, 1991.

3. Kilbourne, Jean. Deadly Persuasion: Why Women and Girls Must Fight the Addictive Power of Advertising. Free Press, 1999.

4. Thompson, J. Kevin, and Leslie J. Heinberg. “The Media’s Influence on Body Image Disturbance and Eating Disorders: We’ve Reviled Them, Now Can We Rehabilitate Them?” Journal of Social Issues, vol. 55, no. 2, 1999, pp. 339–353.

5. Grabe, Shelly, L. Monique Ward, and Janet Shibley Hyde. “The Role of the Media in Body Image Concerns Among Women: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental and Correlational Studies.” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 134, no. 3, 2008, pp. 460–476.

6. Tiggemann, Marika, and Amy Slater. “NetGirls: The Internet, Facebook, and Body Image Concern in Adolescent Girls.” International Journal of Eating Disorders, vol. 46, no. 6, 2013, pp. 630–633.

7. Fardouly, Jasmine, and Lenny R. Vartanian. “Social Media and Body Image Concerns: Current Research and Future Directions.” Current Opinion in Psychology, vol. 9, 2016, pp. 1–5.

8. Cohen, Rachel, Lauren Irwin, Toby Newton-John, and Amy Slater. “#BodyPositivity: A Content Analysis of Body Positive Accounts on Instagram.” Body Image, vol. 29, 2019, pp. 47–57.

9. Sastre, Alexandra. “Towards a Radical Body Positive: Reading the Online ‘Body Positive’ Movement.” Feminist Media Studies, vol. 14, no. 6, 2014, pp. 929–943.

10. Cwynar-Horta, Jessica. “The Commodification of the Body Positive Movement on Instagram.” Stream: Inspiring Critical Thought, vol. 8, no. 2, 2016, pp. 36–56.

11. Grogan, Sarah. Body Image: Understanding Body Dissatisfaction in Men, Women and Children. 3rd ed., Routledge, 2016.

12. Cash, Thomas F., and Linda Smolak, editors. Body Image: A Handbook of Science, Practice, and Prevention. 2nd ed., Guilford Press, 2011.

13. Levine, Michael P., and Linda Smolak. The Prevention of Eating Problems and Eating Disorders: Theory, Research, and Practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006.

14. Harrison, Kristen, and Joanne Cantor. “The Relationship Between Media Consumption and Eating Disorders.” Journal of Communication, vol. 47, no. 1, 1997, pp. 40–67.

15. Murnen, Sarah K., and Linda Smolak. “Femininity, Masculinity, and Body Image: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Sex Roles, vol. 37, no. 11–12, 1997, pp. 701–719.

16. Tiggemann, Marika. “The Impact of Adolescent Girls’ Life Concerns and Leisure Activities on Body Dissatisfaction, Disordered Eating, and Self-Esteem.” Journal of Genetic Psychology, vol. 162, no. 2, 2001, pp. 133–142.

17. Smolak, Linda. “Body Image in Children and Adolescents: Where Do We Go from Here?” Body Image, vol. 1, no. 1, 2004, pp. 15–28.

18. Paxton, Susan J., and Karina L. Neumark-Sztainer. “Prevention of Body Dissatisfaction and Disordered Eating: What Next?” Eating Disorders, vol. 14, no. 4, 2006, pp. 265–285.

19. Holmqvist, Kristina, and Ann Frisén. “Body Dissatisfaction Across Cultures: A Systematic Review.” International Journal of Eating Disorders, vol. 45, no. 6, 2012, pp. 792–801.

20. National Eating Disorders Association (NEDA). “Body Image and Eating Disorders.” NEDA.org, 2020.

21. Fikkan, Janna, and Esther D. Rothblum. “Is Fat a Feminist Issue? Exploring the Gendered Nature of Weight Bias.” Sex Roles, vol. 66, no. 9–10, 2012, pp. 575–592.

22. Puhl, Rebecca M., and Chelsea A. Heuer. “Obesity Stigma: Important Considerations for Public Health.” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 100, no. 6, 2010, pp. 1019–1028.

23. Tylka, Tracy L., and Nichole L. Wood-Barcalow. “What Is and What Is Not Positive Body Image? Conceptual Foundations and Construct Definition.” Body Image, vol. 14, 2015, pp. 118–129.

24. Fredrickson, Barbara L., and Tomi-Ann Roberts. “Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women’s Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks.” Psychology of Women Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 2, 1997, pp. 173–206.

25. Menzel, Jessie E., and Michael P. Levine. “Embodying Experiences and the Promotion of Positive Body Image: The Example of Competitive Athletics.” In Body Image: A Handbook of Science, Practice, and Prevention, edited by Thomas F. Cash and Linda Smolak, Guilford Press, 2011, pp. 163–171.

26. Dittmar, Helga. “How Do ‘Body Perfect’ Ideals in the Media Have a Negative Impact on Body Image and Behaviors? Factors and Processes Related to Self and Identity.” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, vol. 28, no. 1, 2009, pp. 1–19.

27. Perloff, Richard M. “Social Media Effects on Young Women’s Body Image Concerns: Theoretical Perspectives and an Agenda for Research.” Sex Roles, vol. 71, no. 11–12, 2014, pp. 363–377.

28. Fardouly, Jasmine, Phillippa C. Diedrichs, Lenny R. Vartanian, and Emma Halliwell. “Social Comparisons on Social Media: The Impact of Facebook on Young Women’s Body Image Concerns and Mood.” Body Image, vol. 13, 2015, pp. 38–45.

29. Holland, Grace, and Marika Tiggemann. “A Systematic Review of the Impact of the Use of Social Networking Sites on Body Image and Disordered Eating Outcomes.” Body Image, vol. 17, 2016, pp. 100–110.

30. Rodgers, Rachel F., and Eleanor H. Wertheim. “Body Image, Disordered Eating, and the Role of the Media.” In Encyclopedia of Feeding and Eating Disorders, edited by Tracey Wade, Springer, 2016, pp. 1–6.

#GenXWomen #BodyImage #VenusInAstrology #VedicAstrology #BodyAcceptance #DietCulture #GenerationalHealing #BodyPositivity #GenX #AstrologyCommunity